USVI & Guam residents challenge discriminatory overseas voting laws
FREDERIKSTED, St Croix, USVI- Residents of the US Virgin Islands(USVI), Guam, and other territories are escalating their fight against federal and state overseas voting laws that they believe discriminate against them. The recent development in the Borja v. Nago case filed before the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit aims to challenge these laws.
This week, the plaintiffs urged the court to counter the US Justice Department's stance that voting is not a “fundamental right” for residents of US territories. The Justice Department's viewpoint is that these residents could vote for the president by absentee ballot in their previous state of residence if they resided in any foreign nation or the Northern Mariana Islands. However, this right is denied if they reside in places like Guam or the US Virgin Islands.
Furthermore, the Justice Department believes that, even if these laws are deemed unconstitutional, the federal government is immune from lawsuits. They argue that states like Hawaii could remedy any harm stemming from federal discrimination. The department also suggests that the right approach to fixing this discrimination might be to revoke overseas voting rights in the Northern Mariana Islands rather than ensuring equal rights to all.
'Federal Government continues to diminish democracy'- Neil Weare
Neil Weare, co-director of Right to Democracy, expressed disappointment in the Justice Department's stance. “This is just another example of how the federal government continues to diminish democracy, self-determination, and political power in US territories,” he said. He emphasised that the right to vote is essential irrespective of one's place of residence.
Parker Rider-Longmaid, representing the Borja plaintiffs, criticised the Justice Department's defense of the federal law, stating that it is the federal government's responsibility to address the discrimination caused by the law.
Last year, a challenge to these laws was rejected by a Hawaii district court. As per existing regulations, residents of states like Hawaii who move to a foreign nation or the Northern Mariana Islands retain the right to vote for the president via absentee ballot. But this privilege is not extended to those relocating to Guam, the US Virgin Islands, or other territories.
The case is now awaiting oral argument before the Ninth Circuit, which is anticipated to occur early next year.
In connection with this legal battle, Right to Democracy has initiated a Territories Art Competition for youth aged 12-17. They are encouraged to convey their understanding of democracy through visual arts, words, or music. Prizes will be awarded to winners from each territory. The submission deadline is set for October 10, 2023.
Neil Weare hopes that the youth in each territory will use this platform to express their views on democracy, even as the Justice Department continues to oppose such a right in US territories.
.png)
Follow Us On
16 Responses to “USVI & Guam residents challenge discriminatory overseas voting laws”
Ok. Why is the USVI still an unincorporated territory with no approved constitution? Typically, in the past incorporated territories move on to statehood. As a rule of thumb up to Hawaii and Alaska becoming states in 1959, a territory with a 60,000 population with an organized constitution could apply for statehood. The USVI population is over 100,000. Should the USVI get an approved constitution and apply for statehood? Should it apply for statehood alone? Should it join up with Puerto Rico, etc, and apply for statehood? Is it in the USVI best interest to get a constitution, attain more local self-governance/more sovereignty, and remain a territory? Should the USVI have bicameral legislature vice the current unicameral legislature?