Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

HoA Constitutional Report: ‘No Term Limits for the Premier’

(L-R) Andrew A. Fahie and Premier Dr the Hon Natalio D. Wheatley (R7) are the most recent premiers of the Virgin Islands. Photo: Government of the Virgin Islands/File
(L-R) Former Chief Minister and Premier of the Virgin Islands Ralph T. O’Neal and former Chief Minister of the Virgin Islands H. Lavity Stoutt. Photo: Government of the Virgin Islands/File
(L-R) Former Chief Minister and Premier of the Virgin Islands Ralph T. O’Neal and former Chief Minister of the Virgin Islands H. Lavity Stoutt. Photo: Government of the Virgin Islands/File
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI- The Lisa E. Penn-Lettsome-led Constitutional Review Commission recommended that the question of term limits for the Premier be determined by referendum, noting that term limits are more relevant in systems where the Premier is directly elected. In the current parliamentary arrangement, the Penn-Lettsome report regarded term limits as less compelling.

However, the House of Assembly (HoA) of the Virgin Islands Constitutional Review Report by the Committee of the Whole House rejected the idea of a referendum. A team led by Premier and Minister of Finance Dr the Hon Natalio D. Wheatley (R7) will be conducting constitutional negotiations in London later this year. 

In fact, Elected Legislators “agreed that no term-limit referendum or constitutional provision should be introduced” and have stated no constitutional amendment will be proposed.

The HoA, via its Committee report, recommended retaining the existing constitutional arrangements for selection and tenure of the Premier, without imposing constitutional term limits.

Rationale of elected members

Members considered that the Premier’s tenure is already subject to parliamentary confidence and electoral accountability. They were not persuaded that term limits would improve governance outcomes in the Virgin Islands’ parliamentary system, and preferred to prioritise other reforms aimed at strengthening accountability and institutional performance.

In the 75-year history of the restoration of the Legislature of the Virgin Islands, there have been only seven Chief Ministers/Premiers. They were Chief Ministers: H. Lavity Stoutt, Dr Willard Wheatley, MBE, and  Cyril B. Romney. Additionally, both  Ralph T. O’Neal, OBE and Dr D. Orlando Smith, OBE, served both as Chief Ministers and Premiers. The final two Premiers are Andrew A. Fahie and current Premier Dr the Hon Natalio D. Wheatley (R7), who is the grandson of the late Dr Willard Wheatley.   

25 Responses to “HoA Constitutional Report: ‘No Term Limits for the Premier’”

  • jack (13/04/2026, 08:07) Like (1) Dislike (12) Reply
    Well done to the house
  • annudda2cents (13/04/2026, 08:11) Like (42) Dislike (1) Reply
    What was the point of putting together a Commission in the first place, to later reject the majority of their recommendations? Asking on behalf of myself as a concerned resident and registered voter.
  • All 13! (13/04/2026, 08:12) Like (31) Dislike (6) Reply
    Get rid of all of these clowns let’s get some people with integrity and actually willing to serve, don’t even consider people like Lettsome and others and that committee all
    Cronies!
  • Peter Wickham (Barbados Political Analyst) (13/04/2026, 08:19) Like (28) Dislike (4) Reply
    The people of the BVI will decide term limits. The politicians ducking from it. This will happen because they want to hold on to power over the people forever, but it is the people who will decide. Want to test the true character of a man, give him power and you'll see hypocrisy prevailing until his time is due.
  • Great info (13/04/2026, 08:31) Like (8) Dislike (1) Reply
    It would have been more informative to list hoe long each served and maybe even the years
    • Tigress (13/04/2026, 15:03) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
      i agree with your suggestion of listing the years served and by doing so we will see who got there by default and the length of time served as head
  • local boy (13/04/2026, 09:00) Like (19) Dislike (0) Reply
    I hope the Governor in his wisdom stalls it. So the Constitutional negotiations could start after the next election. ALL 13 MUST GO. GEH R U MS OUTTA OUR HOUSE.
  • ok (13/04/2026, 09:03) Like (9) Dislike (7) Reply
    Love the current Premier, but here is my take. This is exactly how and why corruption creeps in. But, the key question is who will change it? As you can see, certainly not the ones that stand to benefit...meaning it will NEVER change. My opinion is that there should be a max of three terms. But, hey, who am in a world of politricks?
  • WHAT!!! (13/04/2026, 09:07) Like (29) Dislike (9) Reply
    Our premier should be elected by a vote of the people
    Why is a picture of a convicted felon displayed?.
    • @WHAT!!! (13/04/2026, 10:01) Like (11) Dislike (1) Reply
      His picture is displayed because he is a former Premier, conviction notwithstanding.
    • RealPol (13/04/2026, 11:57) Like (11) Dislike (0) Reply
      @What, the Premier being voted directly by the people is a viable option. However, the political structure will have to be revamped. Under the current parliamentary (Westminster ) system, Prime Minister Ministers, Premiers, Chief Ministers, etc, are not voted on directly by the people. Fellow elected members vote on who becomes PM, Premier, Chief Minister. What you are suggesting is more in line with the Presidental system. There are pros and cons with the Presidential system; well, no system is perfect. The Presidental system can lead to divide government, gridlock, ie, if a majority of elected members are of a different political view than the Premier. On the other hand, under the Westminster system generally and for the most part once a government is formed, it pass most of its legislative agenda.

      Agree, that the Premier should have some demonstrated,,effective, government operations,etc., experience. Hear is a news flash. Directly voting for Premier under the current system would be needed up as Hogan’s ram goat. The people have the true power and should use it to put in place the system they want. It is a representative democracy and the politicians work and represent for the best interests of the people..The people must stay engaged to ensure they are getting their expectations met. The people must wake from their deep REM sleep and stand up, speak out, etc.
      • Stealth (13/04/2026, 19:15) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
        RealPol, the BVI already a term limit system. It is the People; the people decide through their elected members who becomes Premier. Canada, Australia, New Zealand, among former colonies which don’t vote directly for their top government leader. Israel too has a parliament system but Israelis also don’t vote directly for Prime Minister. After an election, the President appoints someone to serve as PM. Voting directly for BVI Premier will take serious effort.
  • right (13/04/2026, 09:30) Like (9) Dislike (1) Reply
    Remember folks when all you go UK remember you not negotiating for me okkkk. You gangsters are negotiating for yourselves okkkk. None of what you’re saying has nothing to do with what the people of the BVI want okkkk. You people continue to be self righteous and greedy and misrepresent your office. The record will show your poor conscience. Judgement day the most high God coming.
  • Local (13/04/2026, 09:48) Like (9) Dislike (1) Reply
    Notice how it what "they" want and not what THE PEOPLE want?
  • Term limits a must . (13/04/2026, 10:49) Like (20) Dislike (1) Reply
    The report is just a recommendation documents, No Leader should serve no more than 3 consecutive terms. That should be an international law . Here is Why, corruption get out of control, creates a Sense of ownership and belong...A dictator mentality developed, Greed and control instinct become natural...So, after 3 terms, next man up, fresh ideas, new mindset..
  • tom (13/04/2026, 14:29) Like (3) Dislike (11) Reply
    The vip and natalio will be there for another 20 years
  • Doll (13/04/2026, 14:34) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    Right now, its just recommendations and i guess they have to vote on it. However, we don't need any type of dictatorship here. Leave these type of crap for Countries such as Russia, Belarus, Iran, North Korea and who knows, the United States might be heading in that direction, if DT has any say in it. I hope the electorate has some balls to stand up against this Führer!
  • 6 7 (13/04/2026, 15:16) Like (1) Dislike (1) Reply
    Mitch Turnbull have to go he and his team Rasheed he gives hands out to
  • Con artists (13/04/2026, 17:03) Like (5) Dislike (0) Reply
    You all didn’t want Myron to go to the UK, as if that would have made a difference. Does it matter who goes now? They are going there on their own behalf, not the people of the Virgin Islands. I’m starting to hate all of them now.
  • Vision (13/04/2026, 19:55) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    Only a leader with a dictatorial mindset will want no time limit for Premier. Aa In other words, able or not dictators prefer to. die in power than to ease the country (B.V.I) of chaotic political misdirection. Do you know of anyone that fits this egotistical mindset? I do, and many of you too do.
  • Xxx (14/04/2026, 09:06) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    Bvi too small for Dictators,2 terms is more than enough, what's next Communism.
    • Raw and Unfiltered (14/04/2026, 13:18) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
      @Xxx, BVI tiny size is one of the primary reasons BVI residents should be extremely vigilant, vigilate, etc, guarding against autocracy, dictatorship whether it is from Mount Olympus or from local government. In large locales, it takes many to pull it off; small locales with small populations,,a few. I’m not saying the BVI is on the road to autocracy. Nonetheless, lets us be vigilant and vigilate ( always on watch).
  • Turtle Dove (14/04/2026, 11:53) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    My concern is:What if The Premier is not serving the People is not doing his duties to the country and the people and just for the 1%,what is the legal way to get rid of Him/Her without marching?That should be in the Constitution.
  • Mash One (14/04/2026, 12:32) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    We should have legal rights to vote to get that person out instead of marching and by that the majority don’t have to worry because it’s not like marching where the cronies wouldn’t see you so you will not have any fear of them taking action against you.
  • BRAD BOYNES (14/04/2026, 13:58) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    In fact, Elected Legislators “agreed that no term-limit referendum or constitutional provision should be introduced” and have stated no constitutional amendment will be proposed.

    The tax payers in the Virgin Islands should be deciding this.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.