Common assault charge needs re-examination – caller
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – One caller on the 3D radio show which was aired on a local radio station on September 21, 2012 believes that some of the offences that are before the courts today are in need of revision in order for the problem of overcrowding at the prison to be alleviated.
“I heard the Minister talk about the overcrowding of the prison… and I think what contributes to that is the penalty that is imposed on some of the offences that were committed", the caller opined.
The caller was at the time referencing a statement made by Minister for Education and Culture, Hon. Myron V. Walwyn at the House of Assembly Sitting held on September 3, 2012.
Giving an example to support his stance, the caller said if two persons on the road are involved in a fight it is considered a common assault.
The caller also noted that with the clause of occasioning grievous bodily harm added to the offence, it automatically becomes indictable. Once persons are found guilty with this particular offence, they are usually given a “lengthy sentence” the caller claimed.
“Maybe the legal fraternity and Attorney General’s chambers need to look at some of these offences and penalties”, he added.
He noted that common assault, once tried in a Magistrates’ court, carries a summary conviction but because of the additional clause added it becomes indictable. This he felt causes the offence to have to be tried by a judge and jury.
The caller suggested that persons could perhaps be fined instead of incarcerated for an offence such as this or have much reduced sentence to the ones currently in place rather than having to go to the high court for the offence and receiving a lengthy sentence.
Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.
5 Responses to “Common assault charge needs re-examination – caller ”