Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

UPDATE: Worrying education stats presented on VI's students

Education Officer Ms Connie George, while making a presentation titled ‘Filling the Gap’ noted that education reform remained ongoing within the Territory and said changes are inevitable. VINO/File
Despite the rains, a sizeable crowd turned out last evening, February 18, 2014 to hear of government’s proposal of an additional year to be introduced at high schools across the Territory. After hearing the presentations though, the majority opted to reject the proposal for various reasons. Photo: VINO
Despite the rains, a sizeable crowd turned out last evening, February 18, 2014 to hear of government’s proposal of an additional year to be introduced at high schools across the Territory. After hearing the presentations though, the majority opted to reject the proposal for various reasons. Photo: VINO
The consultation with residents, held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall saw presentations from various education officials, including subject Minister Hon. Myron V. Walwyn. Photo: VINO
The consultation with residents, held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall saw presentations from various education officials, including subject Minister Hon. Myron V. Walwyn. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
Scene from the public meeting with residents on the introduction of an additional school year at the Secondary School level held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall on February, 18, 2014. Photo: VINO
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – Worrying trends and statistics were presented to residents when they assembled on February 18, 2014 at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall to hear details of government’s proposal of an extra year to be added to high schools across the Territory.

Passing rates at the Territory’s High School, while being described as much less than the failure rates, present some cause for concern especially given last year’s sharp increase in failures.

Statistics showed that over 12 percent of students (35) failed school leaving exams last year from a batch of 252 students. The previous two years showed that less than five percent had failed while less than 10 percent had failed in 2009-2010.

Education Officer Ms Connie George, while making a presentation titled ‘Filling the Gap’ noted that education reform remained ongoing within the Territory and said changes are inevitable.

Speaking on first time entrants at the H. Lavity Stoutt Community College (HLSCC), George related that over a three year period (201), more than half of the students entering college required at least one pre-college course.

Additionally, a whopping 94 percent of students entering the HLSCC were reported as requiring pre-college Mathematics while nearly half (49 percent) required tutoring in pre-college English.  

College administrators were ultimately forced to introduce a pre-college science course after it was revealed that 52 percent of students required two or more pre-college courses.

George told residents that while it was recognised that some good was being done with students, there were some obvious gaps that needed to be filled.

“The cause of the many shortcomings is definitely not limited to any one thing and efforts to improve education institutions, teaching and learning have been ongoing,” George stated.

It was in this vein that additional instructional time was being proposed as a remedy to combat the trends and assist in bettering the performance of students.

She further informed residents that a number of states in the United States of America, the United Kingdom, China and parts of the Caribbean have already increased their instructional hours.

 See previous story posted February 19, 2014:

Residents reject gov’t proposal for extra high school year

ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – Despite the rains, a sizeable crowd turned out last evening, February 18, 2014 to hear of government’s proposal of an additional year to be introduced at high schools across the Territory. After hearing the presentations though, the majority opted to reject the proposal for various reasons.

The consultation with residents, held at the Sir Rupert Briercliffe Hall saw presentations from various education officials, including subject Minister Hon. Myron V. Walwyn.

Residents also heard from Education Consultant Dr Charles Wheatley, Principal of the BVI Technical & Vocational Institute Ms Germain Scatliffe, Registrar and Director of Enrollment Management at the H. Lavity Stoutt Community College (HLSCC) Dr Luverne Baptiste and Ms Connie George.

Scheduled to take effect from the new school term in September 2014, the changes propose increased hours of instruction as well as a revamping of the names attributed to levels throughout the school system from Class and Form to Grade. The changes are expected to be mandatory at private and public high schools across the Territory.

There will also be the insertion of a Grade 7 at the First Form level as the extra school year. Dr George informed listeners that First Form was traditionally referred to as Grade 8. The system will extend from Kindergarten – Grade 12.

The proposed changes are set to be implemented at the Third Form level from the new school term and are not expected to affect current Fourth and Fifth Form students.

Dr Wheatley spoke of past education reforms in the Territory and themes of nature and nurture and expressed that children do not learn if they are not mature for learning. He argued that proponents are trying to repair and redesign the school system so that students can get the best benefit from what is being offered.

“We must ensure that we do not design a system that is not going to break our children,” he said, “We are breaking the hearts of a lot of our children every day. A lot of us are doing that by the way we interact with them, the way we treat them, the way we speak to them…”

After the presentations, residents and radio listeners were allowed to give feedback and Lecturer and parent, Natalio D. Wheatley aka Sowande Uhuru said he was still not convinced that the added year was a solution to the problem being experienced in the school systems. He compared it to a child being fed three meals per day and the child refusing to eat vegetables. He argued that the introduction of a fourth meal could not be a logical solution to the issue.

Sowande offerred that behavioural challenges were being experienced by some students at HLSCC, some of whom are students that slipped through the cracks of the educational system. He proposed that improvements be made in areas such as professional development and learning before attempting to correct a problem with the wrong solution. “I do not believe that the length of time has much to do with some of what is happening right now, it’s the quality of time,” Wheatley said.

One overseas caller said after listening to the presentations, she did not feel it was right to add an additional class at the High School level and suggested the additional year be added at the primary school level. She also criticised elements of the proposed curriculum and said students were not reading at their correct grade level at primary school. “All we are doing is socially promoting them, that’s why we have the problem in the high school…” she stated.

Done deal?

The caller, along with Sowande, also questioned whether the proposals were already a done deal and asked whether the input and feedback being received by residents would be given any weight in decisions being made.

Ms George addressed the issues by stating that the curriculum concerns as well as the implementation time were all part of ongoing discussions.

Another caller said she was unsure whether she was for or against the proposal but suggested some changes needed to be made to the approach taken by teachers and parents to education.

One educator who spoke in support of the proposed changes, said some of the best educational systems in the world have one thing in common which is the inclusion of an additional year in the school system. He said students would be better equipped morally, socially and cognitively to deal with the work they have to do with the planned changes.

Another educator however, stated that while great programmes that compared to other developed societies may be needed, early childhood education was the better approach to be taken. “We need to invest in effective early intervention so then we can deal with the individuals that have social issues, behavioural issues and academic issues,” she said.

Other residents voiced their disagreements and shared similar sentiments to those who had spoken previously as members of the audience in attendance applauded while they spoke to indicate their approval of the comments made.

A second meeting is scheduled for February 26, 2014 at 7:30PM to be held at the Catholic Community Centre in Virgin Gorda.

48 Responses to “ UPDATE: Worrying education stats presented on VI's students”

  • What a set (19/02/2014, 08:34) Like (20) Dislike (25) Reply
    Part of the issue that no one is speaking about is the NDP and Myron does not have the moral authority to bring anything new to the people. Because of the history of lies we believe this is political MOVE and the NDP has them own agenda so WE DO NOT WANT IT WE CANNOT TRUST MYRON THEY MUST GO
  • No man!! (19/02/2014, 08:55) Like (15) Dislike (13) Reply
    anything ball head touch don't make any sense
    • yes man (21/02/2014, 05:40) Like (1) Dislike (1) Reply
      i dont see y all the fuss six form is in St.kitts Nevis for ever, and is very successful. Tola people
      wind toooo nuch. Go for it Educators
  • ann (19/02/2014, 09:05) Like (17) Dislike (18) Reply
    What the hell WRONG with this man why he focing something he see in Antigua on we in the BV...thatis what you get for not electing your own!!!!!
    • VIwoman (20/02/2014, 10:05) Like (4) Dislike (1) Reply
      Antigua dont not have that. They donot have extra time or classes. Antigua secondary school start from 8:30 and end at 1:30.
  • Listen (19/02/2014, 09:05) Like (10) Dislike (9) Reply
    It is for the leaders to propose what they think is in the best interest of the student. This change can only assist and aid the student in the long run. Let us stop the negativity and embrace a change that is needed and that will be on par with other institutions regionally and world-wide. I wonder if they want a system like China and Japan which sees children in school all up to 5 and 6?
    • chad (20/02/2014, 11:32) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      In Canada, children are introduce to Pre schools, which we would have as stage one at age 6. This is a fact, which I was aware of while living in the country.
  • parent (19/02/2014, 09:17) Like (23) Dislike (7) Reply
    I totally agree with the extra year being added to primary school not high school
    • Examiner (19/02/2014, 11:24) Like (2) Dislike (3) Reply
      Respected educators are saying adding a year to primary school will not fix the deficit in the current high school syllabus. This revelation ought to be a game changer for concerned parents. Just saying no, is not the answer.
  • JW (19/02/2014, 09:47) Like (16) Dislike (18) Reply
    Myron and the rest of the ndp needs rejecting at the polls.
  • Examiner (19/02/2014, 10:20) Like (16) Dislike (1) Reply
    I am not totally against an additional year. However this extension must not be presented as the only/best option. It must accompany comprehensive reform from Kindergarten to the final grade. It requires more than window dressing by changing one label to another. Early childhood education strategies must be implemented. Extension of the school day to mirror the typical work-day and help acclimate the students to hourly demands of the workforce.
    If children are not reading at the required levels, then this deficiency will impact negatively on their learning.
    In the context of learning, adding one year to the curriculum only yields positive results if the students are motivated to learn
    A word of caution to the parents: don’t hold the attitude that we have done it “this way” and see no need to change. Today there are greater educational demands on our children then when their parents were in school. In fact many of the parents cannot help their children with their homework.
    Fixing the myriad shortfalls in our educational system requires more than window dressing. It demands a comprehensive reform in every aspect of the pipeline – from administrator, teacher and counselor to student.
  • janet (19/02/2014, 10:26) Like (11) Dislike (1) Reply
    The grade need to be added in Primary School. Grade 6 - 8 should be included in a Junior High School.
    • mother hen (19/02/2014, 11:19) Like (6) Dislike (8) Reply
      I guess he saw this one on tv on his trip to papa new guanine
      • laughing (20/02/2014, 23:15) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
        Your comment is a good example of why we need more school time. There is place called Papa New Guanine. It is Papua New Guinea. No sense of geography and so skills in English. Sad state of affairs and you come on blogging.
    • BVI overseas (19/02/2014, 11:36) Like (5) Dislike (1) Reply
      Correction. A Junior High school from 6th grade to 8th grade. High school will start from 9th grade to 12th grade.
  • Elementary Teacher (19/02/2014, 10:47) Like (5) Dislike (0) Reply
    Why is it that everyone feel that all bright ideas should be dumped into the Elementary Schools? While the initiative is a good one, I do not feel it should be added to the elementary schools or added at the later part of secondary, but rather it be implemented as a Junior High, where students leaving the elementary system this year will go to Junior High and all students who are already in High School will continue on the traditional way. Which is they will graduate in 5 years. We must not be too eager to change things but rather phase them in so that we can see how well it will work. JUST MY OPINION!
    • yeah (20/02/2014, 13:06) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
      I totally agree with you. While I do not have kids I have noticed the great pains my friends have gone through to get their children ready for High School. The kind of materials that the class 5 students have to go through is jammed packed, and I think a junior high will better serve the children than a 6th, form. Cramming information in a child to prepare then for an exam is not learning. Give the children time and space to assimilate what they are being thought.
  • graduated at 16 (19/02/2014, 11:30) Like (11) Dislike (8) Reply
    I graduated ages ago (27 years) at age sixteen and after high school went straight into the work field. No HLSCC that time. Although I have my degree in Accounting, I attend enrichment classes at HLSCC however, so many of the students transitioning from High School to college are not mature enough. College education for BVIslanders are paid for by the tax payers. I get upset to see these young people in class texting or facebooking or playing games on their electronic gadgets and a professor is discussing the days lesson. Let them stay in high school 1 extra year to mature, it will do them some good along with the college and the work force. Minister Walwyn I agree with you, 1 more year.
    • Hmm (19/02/2014, 13:23) Like (20) Dislike (1) Reply
      Do you think one more year in high school will change the mentality of some of these children? The children of today have no sense of urgency, priority or mission in life. They are laid back and really don't care. Another year in high school will not change that. Most of those children come from homes where the proper guidance is lacking. Until the home environment changes, it will not get any better.
  • BVI overseas (19/02/2014, 11:31) Like (5) Dislike (0) Reply
    A grade should not be added to the 12th grade. There should be a Middle or Junior High school with 6th and 7th grades. That is long overdue-----A JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL FOR 6th and 7th GRADES.
  • Yes (19/02/2014, 12:32) Like (1) Dislike (5) Reply
    I wonder if people could read? The additional grade is being inserted as Grade 7, which is transition from Primary to Secondary and I think that's a good idea. Additionally with Grade 12 having the option of more time to master what's being taught while being able to sit CXC, CAPE, A Levels and even Pre-College courses based on GPA/abilities, how can that be negative? I know why, because it's a change. Because Teachers and Parents now have to work harder. Because it will be more challenging for the kids and we can no longer leave them to themselves. This is not about what's best for youth, this is what's best for the adults. They're being selfish about this and who not selfish are purely political. I can understand finding ways to tweak the system, add/remove things here and there. But to flat out say "NO" makes no sense. In the presentation they clearly stated it's not just about adding a form, but also about revamping the ENTIRE SYSTEM from K-12. What's negative about that? ALong the way I'm sure changes will be made as they put things in practice. The last change to our system was the lowering of the grade level and nobody had a problem with that. SMH!
    • SMACK (20/02/2014, 20:04) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
      While revamping the entire system from K-12, they urgently need to revamp the Education Department starting with the CEO among others
  • l (19/02/2014, 13:18) Like (5) Dislike (0) Reply
    My concern was where the extra grade would be added. As long as it is 7th grade they are adding, I'm satisfied. We needed it a long time ago. The next step is to introduce a junior high school (grades 6 to 8).
    • Examiner (19/02/2014, 14:57) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
      Many naysayers are advocating having a junior high school or adding an additional year at primary school. Evidently there is a great need for such amendment at that level. However, this change still will not meet the need for fulfilling the current high school syllabus.
  • my two cents (19/02/2014, 13:33) Like (22) Dislike (2) Reply
    I am not totally against this move, but it needs to be fully thought out and structured properly.... I choose to write my thoughts here so I won't be victimized for my comments:
    1..It should not affect the students who are already in there on a five year path.

    2...It would seem that persons who choose technical subjects will do a three year path, thats fine you will sign up for that...but if my child opt not to do that and continue on the senior plan of two years he/she should be able to do so...not because your course is for three years mine should automatically become three years....Depend on the profession you choose to be in you will know how many years you will be in a course.

    3..If this is to take place it should in no way shape or form affect those students who are presently in the high school. It should begin at the end of primary school with a seventh grade(junior high). preparing students for the transition into the high school.

    4...Stop putting the cart before the horse....Elmore Stoutt High is in need of a curriculum...This needs to be addressed YESTERDAY...when we check the secondary schools around the BVI each is doing their own thing...Hon. Walwyn this is where you should focus your efforts. Give the additional year some more time to be planned properly...

    5. I have a child in the ESHS who has been working to ensure that he gets out in the 5 years he was told he needs to complete high school, why should he suffer because you people decide it should now be 6 years... now. You can't change my program midstream....lets those who are coming in know from the beginning you are entering a 6 year programme.

    6. Where are the statics to back up the statements that the college says children aren't ready......Some won't be but we need to look at the majority....the same children make it through and graduate...what is the drop out rate???

    7. I am here sitting laughing because like everything else the government of the day has already decided on their course of action and now they coming to the public....Who do you all really thing you're fooling.....You have heard, I hope this will cause you to now go back to the drawing board.
  • Educator (19/02/2014, 14:00) Like (2) Dislike (3) Reply
    Uninformed persons make sofist arguments that often leads our people astray. To those parents whose claim is that one more year is adding to their already struggling state to provide for their children, my question to you is, if your child finishes in Form 5 and have difficulty finding a job will you still struggle and feed them? Is it wise for us to continue develop a population of young people who can barely qualify for entry level job in the government sector, but not the private? How long will we continue to force three years of work on students with only a small majority succeeding? Do we truly want to practice what happens in the wider Caribbean where only a small percentage of their students go on to do Cape? Our benchmark for scholarship is now Five (5) CXC's are we not concern for our citizens who would never be able to pay for a college education for their child and obtaining a scholarship is the only way? Is it not the government responsibility to provide the means necessary for our children to succeed? As a CXC teacher we see students struggle to succeed because we pushed every syllabi in preparation of these exams. Parents who were not exposed to School leaving exams complained that we must get rid of it and focus on CXC's only, however,, most recently the Caribbean Examination Council implemented a school leaving certification, in this regards we are operating from a visionary stand point. This measure is not a fourth meal or vegetables, nor is it an adoption of the U.S., but simple an implantation of policies that were recognized and slated for implementation years ago. Finally, note that CXC's has changed drastically within the last five years and your child is now required to learn all that you learnt years ago plus everything else that came out after you left school, including something as simple as computer operation.



  • The TRUTH (19/02/2014, 18:10) Like (2) Dislike (1) Reply
    EVERYTHING THAT MINISTER PUT HIS HANDS TO TURNS ______. TOO SELFISH....... THIS IS NOT THE TIME FOR THIS. THERE NEEDS TO BE A referendum do things the right way. who are you to wake up with this
  • enough (19/02/2014, 18:18) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    My two cents! In this society we continue to say the children are the problem. Let me set the record straight. The education system is failing the children. We have children of 2014 and trying to teach them as we taught children of 70s. When will we get a grip!!!! Adding an additional class will benefit not one; if the children are still being taught from the same curriculum. We say the children don’t want to learn but MY GOD if I was going to school in this period. I would not want to learn too. The advent of computers have made it easier for me to assist my child with home work and research but at the high school level computers are not a greater part of the learning experience. What about smart boards where teachers can stop in the middle of a session, go on line and find backup or examples for a subject matter. Why not implement junior high, grades 6 and 7 and then they begin high school at grade at the high school. The children do need more time to develop and mature but not when they are already developed and immature.
    • Real! (20/02/2014, 09:52) Like (1) Dislike (2) Reply
      If more people came out to the meeting then we won't have such ill-informed comments. As a part of the change they're revamping the ENTIRE system from K-12 which involves revision of the curriculum. It's not just inserting a class and that's it. They had a very good presentation which covered all aspects of education from K-12 and the changes they plan to make. They included plans for Teacher Professional Development and other training for Teachers. It also involved the approach to teaching and also early intervention for kids with issues. Additionally, the Technical School provides another avenue for reducing the current load on BVIHS while providing an accredited technical option for students seeking that route. IT's not add a class and our kids will be smart. It's a total revamping of the system with an additional class being a part of it. I can only blame Government and the Ministry for not adequately marketing this scheme to the people. It's NOT just adding a class. Why don't online sites have a video link to such presentations? Oh, I know why, because they would be showing facts rather than sensationalism and that won't give the desired effect. Ah boy!
  • alpine (19/02/2014, 18:37) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    I am not for the 7 grade I will prefer if they construct a jr high and go from there not now no we don't want it
  • SMH!! (19/02/2014, 20:22) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    Myron Walwyn have to realize we are a British teritory NOT a US..... well yuh know who to not vote for next year.
  • Keeping it real (19/02/2014, 20:45) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    Adding an additional year may not be a bad thing. Many countries have a 6th form where students do "A" level work in preparation for college. But none of this will not solve the reading and behavioral problems children are facing. Many children grow up in homes where reading is not taught or even encouraged and discipline is severely lacking. Parents need to get more involved in their children's learning and upbringing only then will improvement come about. Adding more hours is outright ridiculous, children get tired and their attention span begins to drop after a period of time. Increased hours will make matters worse. After 8 or more hours on the job we adults are tired so think of a child spending that length of time in school?
  • CONCERN I (19/02/2014, 20:53) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    I thought the extra year or 2 would have lend itself to CAPE, thus allowing students to obtain an associate degree in the required field of learning whether it be technical or otherwise. What the Ministry of Education need to do is to bring in the CXC personnel to further clarify this first with ministry officials and instructors then with students and parents. If the education system lends itself to Preschool, Kindergarten-Grade 6, Form 1-5 and 2 years of College(CAPE). To me another year of Grade is going backwards and the people of the BVI needs to go froward
  • concern1 (19/02/2014, 21:03) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    One other thing is that CXC used to start at 3rd form and now it seems as it is now starting at Grade 6 but the earlier the better we just have to encourage our children not only to think positively put to be independent and well discipline.
  • In Favor (19/02/2014, 22:29) Like (2) Dislike (2) Reply
    As a current student at the Elmore Stoutt High School, I am in favor of the additional year added to the school system. An additional year would improve academic performance because it will provide more teaching hours, in which teacher can fully explain concepts and ensure that the entire class understands the concepts presented in class. It will also provide students and teachers with more time to prepare for School Leaving and CXC. For example, CXC requires a five 40-minute periods per week, including one double period be allocated to the Physics course over a two-year period. Currently, there is no double period and we “try” to complete the course in one year and a term and a half. This results in the syllabus being rushed and students are forced to self-teach themselves on the topics which were not taught in classes. Moreover, an additional year will equip students with the analytical skills and methodical techniques needed for an education at the tertiary level and this ever changing world.
    • tola (20/02/2014, 11:36) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
      Students well prepared at the fifth form level find learning very easy .They do most of their private study at home after school and at weekends. Subject teachers at that level introduce them to the material to be covered give explanations and working examples .Most of a senior student learning takes place during their private study time. Next day they are able to go to their teacher and talk about what they have studied and get help with anything they may not have understand. Assignments/ home work are ways to get students to practice what were taught in school. The problem is many times some of our students have not been trained to be that disciplined from small. Education is something a student have to desire and they need to understand that the present distractions that face most teenagers need to be placed on the back burner as they study to achieve their goal of education . Parents need to make students more responsible and show interest in their assignments etc. Those students who write 11 CXC AND 18 CXC and 21 CXC and pass are not as idle with their study time as some of our students. They don't go to class and play the fool disturbing others from learning. They are not at every party and jam session at weekends and during their exam year. They fix their priorities and their parents support them in doing so.
  • Also Educator (20/02/2014, 08:23) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    It's about efficiency in education, not the number of years at school. That said, In Favor above, makes an articulate and cogent argument as to why more time is needed. We seem to forget that at the end of the day our single best chance to be educated is when we are children. If we do not invest our time into it then (and instead choose to have an outlook that school is a waste of time, maybe why so many want to leave so soon and for what?), there's the devil to pay when you become an adult if you ever see the error of your ways as a youth. By then, time to study is precious and hard to come by. And, if we don't want to go with the extra year, then we as parents need to be more involved in our children's education as pointed out by Keeping It Real. School is not day care. Lastly, the question to the Department of Education is: what is your vision of our children's education now? In 5 years? In 10 years? And what are you doing to get there? Why can't our goal be to have the best educated populated population? We are a country of means, and to me, this is the best way to assure the best possible future.
  • MY TWO PENCE.... (20/02/2014, 09:15) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    MAYBE, JUST MAYBE we can get the HIGHLY PAID "PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS" to pay more attention to our children's needs and not their own. MAYBE, JUST MAYBE we can encourage the OH SO COMMITTED "PARENTS & GAURDIANS" to pay more attention to their children and train them up right and then MAYBE, JUST MAYBE our children, with the current education system, will do just fine. It worked for my Generation because we do have some hard working men and women who excelled not only academically but professionally as well. STOP telling the children that they have a "choice" and that they have "rights" and MAYBE, JUST MAYBE we might be able to curb some of the issues we are facing right now with them. In my house there are two choices. Choice #1 - school, manners and respect Choice #2 - Pack up and leave. They have the right to eat, sleep and go to the bathroom. With that being said....Here we go.
  • apple pie (20/02/2014, 10:24) Like (3) Dislike (4) Reply
    another example that myron and the NDP have failed our kids they must go
  • tola (20/02/2014, 11:07) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    No additional year is needed, That do not address the problem why some students who graduate from high school are behind in Maths and English. Those who excel would continue to excel if the time is extended. It is clear that students who fail at high school did not have the foundation necessary when they entered high school. Also parental involvement was also questionable . We need a plan where those who have learning problems at primary school can get intervention and help at that moment.Dont leave them to come to high school not being able to master the basics. If a child got the minimum pass grade at primary 5 exam. It means you were getting minimum before and you were promoted without getting the help you needed. Stop blaming high school teachers. Students need more education specialist teachers while in the primary school.
  • knowledge (20/02/2014, 11:49) Like (1) Dislike (1) Reply
    What I really think what should be done. Find out what career, the child would like to have. And then the High school,at form two level.TheSchool curriculum should be base on what the child intends to do. The child would have a foundation to start with. The picking of elective classes should start from form two. It they want to be a nurse aply themselves from form two in science/ biology classes. Your child wants to be an IT- computer science or info-tech.
    I think that children waste to much time from form one to three. The best solution, start them as early as possible. The counselours they have at Elmore Stoutt High. Has an important role in this, to play.
    They can help the student to learn their potential and also their gifts and talent.
    Start prepping them when they reach to form one.
    • Examiner (20/02/2014, 18:47) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      I agree. However, students still must successfully navigate the general studies.
  • Reynold (20/02/2014, 12:01) Like (1) Dislike (1) Reply
    I listen to allot of people expressing their opinions about a variety of issues in the BVI. It is your right to express your opinion on whatever issue you so desire. What is more of a concern for me is that there are some people in the community who because of greed will dislike anything that the current Government is looking to do. We have to be mindful of these types of people as they do not have the long time interest of the BVI at heart. They only have the interest of them and their friends. The other pressing issue is that we as a people have to look at the big picture. The BVI is in a competitive situation and sad to say we are losing. No country can survive without an effective work force. Education is one of the pillars that help build a sustainable economy. It’s time for us as a people to stop being so closed minded. Why do you think that it has so many foreigners in the BVI. It’s because employers have found that the labor pool is not as educated as people from other places. Some people prefer to work for Government because they do not want to be mentally challenged or they do not want work to interfere with their personal live. It’s time to stop the short sightedness. THINK PEOPLE
    • Real! (20/02/2014, 14:53) Like (1) Dislike (2) Reply
      You are absolutely right! What's even more sickening is that everybody is up in arms and negative about the proposed changes, but not one person has put forward a viable alternative. This is not about adding a class, it's about revamping the whole system. Where are the alternative proposals? Government should just let our schools remain at the bottom of the pot over a few ill-informed opinions?
  • jamgirl (20/02/2014, 15:54) Like (1) Dislike (1) Reply
    I dont see anything wrong with it my daughter has7 cxc had to do another extra year for cape then on to uwi to get her bachelor honestly speaking some of these young people dont even know how to write a good essay neither do they know the part of speech i agree with him on this one talk with the tutors at the college they will tell you
  • Common Sense (21/02/2014, 14:29) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    this problem is a very delicate one. I think we need to look at the issues or problems in the school and find ways to improve them before we go ahead with change. First of all, we have student who are not reading well at any grade. Is it the students fault or teachers, we need to evaluate things carefully. Secondly we are face alot of behavioural problems in the school. Who do we blame parents, teacher, the community, who. There are children who go into the community college and cant write an essay, their grammar is ridiculous. Who to blame. Is keepin them in school for an extra year gonna help, how?. Be realistic, we need to go back to the basics, see how these children think, evaluate what kind of learners they are, and remember each person learns differently. Stop trying to teach from a text book all the time and get into understanding how these children think. Those with behavioural problems are acting out for a reason, how can we help them. My son had a friend, and this child keeps getting into trouble, my son was able to say to me, that he does these things when he is put on the spot, to hide his problems, he would act out. Bottom line this child went thru primary and first and second form and could not read. How is this possible you say well it did. As a mother with children I realise all my children are different and each of them learn different, so lets all realise this and create ways to help all the students not just some and then we could consider other possibilities.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.